[quote author=“Gilbert”]Apple just crapped on everybody who jumped on the nano.
I own a Nano and I totally disagree.
3.5 x 1.6 x .27 and 1.5 ounces
vs
4.1 x 2.4 x 0.43 and 4.8 ounces
Smaller, thinner, and it weighs less. It’s also 33% cheaper. And, if the screen is anywhere near as fragile as the Nano…nobody will be watching videos on it after a week, there will be too many scratches.
As Groovy stated, it’s also limited in video files…my portable media device plays native Divx…I can fit more then a season of the Simpsons ona 1GB card…and that’s more then I need.
Pass.
Erik